Gebruikersgegevens.

tegen snake: das waar je moet het zelf doen.

maar voor produceren hier wat links naar beatcounters:

w1.171.telia.com/~u17102211/dl/bpm_counter.htm
www.ucsoft.de/sce.html
www.pyramidedata.dk/autobpm.html
www.musebook.com/?page=mbmetronome
users.compaqnet.be/CubicCarrot/
membres.lycos.fr/toniowar/
www.accsi.com/bpm/index.html

ziet er heel gelikt uit met vele functies: usb etc. maar die blauwe dopjes aan de bovenkant nee niet bepaald mijn smaak!

dan vindt ik dit een beetje dubbelzinnig. eerst zeg je dat je draaiervaring moet hebben en dat je ook ervaring met feestjes moet hebben. En nu wil je weer dat je mensen neemt zonder draaiervaring.... en tja als je wilt doorbreken als dj...moet je wel een paar dingen hebben:

1. contacten
2. eigenwijs zijn (ja tis een must zonder kom je niet ver)
3. eigen stijl (je moet niet teveel naar je idolen kijken maar echt je eigen ding doen)
4. veel oefenen en ervaring opdoen.
5. meedoen aan dj contesten en je inschrijven bij dj booking bureau's zodat ze je weten te vinden
6. en deze is het belangrijkst: LUISTER NAAR JE PUBLIEK (EN FANS)!!!!!

waarom nou eigenwijs? je bent heel kneedbaar in het begin, zodat ze alles met je kunnen doen. Je moet jezelf onderscheiden van anderen zodat je ''opvalt''. een beetje attitude kan nooit kwaad....

maar terug naar jou roberto: je hebt mij wel aan het lachen gekregen met je dubbelzinnige opmerking :)

dat is waar....je begrijpt ook wel waarom het gratis is nadat je er een uur mee hebt gespeeld!

zal ik voortaan doen dre :)

lijkt een beetje veel op sita iig klinkt als een meisjesnaam zelf gebruik ik 100% baramuda (vraag niet hoe ik erop ben gekomen!) maar goed een goede naam:

disar vind ik tot nu to het beste wat eruit is gekomen! ik zou die kiezen

ik heb het ook maar vondt het zelfs (toen ik begon) een beetje bout, ik bleef toen hangen met magix music maker 5 en 6 (weet niet uit welk tijdperk onze e-jay kwam).

als iemand dit nodig heeft voor op de pc, check deze link:

users.pandora.be/unimatrixjj/Progs/JunoSonic.zip

heel handig voor vocals!

Bram..

of als je gewoon via een programma wilt doen (multirack op je pc):

members.lycos.nl/bramcom187/index.php?showtopic=19

je hoeft je niet meteen op je teentjes getrapt te voelen hoor, maar als je zo'n antwoord pas 10 dagen later geeft, lijkt het net alsof je aan het spammen bent snap je? trek het je niet zo aan!

groeten,

Bram...

dat is niet helemaal waar... dat is de midi van vroeger, de midi van nu zijn bepaalde tonen en samples die bepaalde programma's (zoals reason en cubase) uit elkaar kunnen halen waarna je het hele bestand kan ''remixen''. ik zie dat dit topicje al aardig oud is maar ik wilde dit even rechtzetten :)

Let's take Reason from the top:

The Reason interface is designed to look like a hardware rack. With the different components of reason looking like actual hardware instruments. Always at the top of the rack is the "Hardware "Interface". This is not really important when you use Reason with Cubase except on the left in the audio out box it should say "Rewire Slave Mode". You get Reason to do this automatically if you load it after loading Cubase.

One other important point with the hardware interface is that Reason can output up to 64 channels into Cubase. If you want each component in Reason to have a separate channel in Cubase then press the "tab" key to flip the rack over and plug the cables for each component directly into the numbered channels on the back of the hardware interface. If you flick back to Cubase the channel numbers correspond to the channel numbers in the rewire panal (in Cubase go panels>rewire to see this).

This sounds a little complicated but it's not really. Plug the Reason components into the hardware interface channels 1-64 and see them appear in Cubase in the rewire channels 1-64 and on the main mixer.

When this is done the Reason components (you have loaded) will come up as possible outputs for your midi channels.

Now I'll go through the Reason components and show you what they do.

How to work the different Reason components:

One component you won't need when using Reason with Cubase is the mixer. It is best to just leave this component out to save space and computer power. Remember I outlined how to connect your Reason components directly to the hardware interface earlier? So let's start instead with the component I use the most, the NN-19 digital sampler.

The NN-19 digital sampler:

This is a very nice sampler that I use for drums as well as for instruments. If you right click in some empty rack space you can select this component to load. You can load as many as you want until your computer locks up.

[IMG]www.dj-tips-and-tricks.com/images/reason-sampler.jpg[/IMG]
This is a nice sampler that lets you pitch shift, filter and adjust the amplification evelope.

The red arrow on the left is where you click to load in the patches included with Reason in the sound bank. The arrow on the right is where you click to load in any sample you want. This is where I load in my own individual drum sounds.

If you load in your own samples remember to right click and initialize the patch so that the sampler setting don't make you sample sound funny.

The Subtractor synth:

This is a software synth that is good for making basslines. Simply give it some midi notes select a suitable bad ass patch and away you go. If you don't know anything about synths don't worry just fiddle with every nob and button while some midi notes loop over and over. Here's what it looks like.

[IMG]www.dj-tips-and-tricks.com/images/reason-synth.jpg[/IMG]
The red arrow points to where to load in the patches included with Reason in the sound bank.

The DR Rex:

This is what I call a loop sampler. What you do is load in special loops called rex files (they have a .rex filename extension). You can edit any loop and create a .rex file if you have another program called Recycle 2. If you don't have Recycle 2 then you are stuck with the rex files included with Reason.

I'll have to explain exactly what a rex file is so that you get how this thing works. What Recycle 2 does is put in marker before every beat. This means the all the kicks and snares and hats in the loop are marked AND mapped to a keyboard.

When you load in the rex file to DR Rex you can change the tempo in the loop without pitch shifting the sounds. This is done because the beats are moved around by the markers so that they get closer or more spaced when the tempo is adjusted. You can make any loop fit the tempo of your song with this baby. You can also put the sounds back in in any order by changing the midi data.

The best thing to do is load up a rex file and have a play with some midi data. Here's what a DR Rex looks like.

[IMG]www.dj-tips-and-tricks.com/images/reason-rex.jpg[/IMG]
The red arrow is where you load in rex files. This baby has all the standard filtering options. Nice.

The ReDrum:

This machine is a stock standard drum sampler. Reason comes with heaps of good drum kits and you can mix and match them. Each strip is the settings for a single drum sound. So the 10 strips correspond to 10 different drum sounds you can load in at once. You can also load in your own drum sounds.

I don't use this machine much since I simply use a number of NN-19 samples (one for each drum sound). I've got a grunty PC though and you might not want to bother hooking up that many samplers.

Here's what this baby looks like.
[IMG]www.dj-tips-and-tricks.com/images/reason-drum.jpg[/IMG]
Load in each drum sound using the buttons below the LED at the top of the strips. Or you can load in a whole drum kit (red arrow). The machine has heaps of patterns for use with the drum kits so check them out.

This machine has patterns that accompany the built in kits. The pattern sequencer is at the bottom. You don't have to use them as you can turn the pattern sequencer off and sequence midi in cubase.

If you are looking to get into production or you want to add a whole host of new sounds to Logic or Cubase then I totally recommend Reason. I have shopped around and found the best place to get a great deal for Reason.

fruityloops is een heel mooi programma om te beginnen (na ejay wat ik dus echt slecht vind...alle loopjes passen wel bij elkaar waardoor je geen eigen sound kan creeren). Zelf een basslijn en synthlijn maken. Check kazaa voor een volledige versie. Btw als je dat doet, neem niet de 3.5 serie maar de 4.1 want daar zit een virus op ;-)

Bram..

ten eerste zou je kunnen zoeken op adobe audition, omdat cool edit is overgenomen door adobe ;-) maar hier een paar (engels talige) tutorials van mn site:

Beat Matching:

This is something I'm pretty familiar with. I work in a major market and have all the tools you could ever want (including ProTools) and yet, when it comes to beat mixing, I will only use CEP. Here is the most accurate way I have found to do this. It seems long and complicated, but if you follow the instructions, after you do this once, it's easy.

1. Get a beat bed from your imaging CD and a file you want to match to it. Have them both loaded and open, for easy access.
2. Make sure they are compatable time signatures. Obviously, it would be very hard to match 3/4 time with 4/4 time. I like to do everything in 4's. Keeps it easy. So, for the sake of this post, let's assume your beat bed is in 4/4 and so is the song you're matching to the bed.
3. Start with your beat bed active in the edit view, not the multi-track. Find the beginning of a musical phrase. Make sure you start with beat 1 and not a pickup note.
4. Begin highlighting a 32 beat phrase. (You can also use 16, but 32 will give you a more accurate match). You will have to count beats in your head and use your ears. This gets easier the more you do it. You know you've got it just right when you loop the section and it's seamless.
5. Once you have found the 32 beat phrase, look at your selection time. Write it down. Let's say it's 15.382 seconds.
6. Switch to the view of the song you want to match. For instance, we'll say Britney spears is what you want to match. In the Britney file, repeat step 4. Find 32 beats and you'll know it's right when you have a seamless loop. You'll want to use songs with similar beats...at least a little close, so that you're not severely changing the speed. Let's assume that Britney's 32 beats are 17.885 seconds. You will need to condense that time to 15.382, to get a perfect beat match to your beat bed.
7. Go into effects/time-pitch/stretch. Make sure you have it set to do a tempo change and preserve the original pitch. There is a textbox where you can type the desired length. With the Britney file open, and the 32 beats highlighted, type the desired length as 15.382. DO NOT PROCESS THIS YET!
8. The window should display a ratio. Write it down.
9. Close the window and highlight the entire Britney file.
10. Re-open the stretch function window.
11. Type in the ratio that you have written down.
12. Process the cut.
13. Voila`! Matched beats!

Removing Vocals:

Is it possible to remove vocals from an existing track?

Well, the short answer is...Yes...and No. The simple reason for these opposite responses is that the process of 'vocal cutting' or 'vocal zapping' (as some say in radio) is a process that's been around for ages, known in many record engineering circles as "A minus B listening". What is that? Well, I've compiled some of our best reponses below to showcase what that is and how it's done.

The tip: If you're using a track from the 60s, 70s or even early 80s, you've probably got a decent shot of removing vocals. Paul McCartney's "Maybe I'm Amazed" (1970), Astrud Gilberto's "Light My Fire" (1969), even Donald F.a.gen's "I.G.Y". and "Walk Between Raindrops" (1982) are four good examples to try out. But it's all to do with structure....

To do this in Audition simply highlight your file and go to Effect>Amplitude>Channel Mixer and select the VOCAL CUT preset. You can preview and toggle between NO MIXING and VOCAL CUT to hear what's happening. You can also alter the phase relationship between the L&R channels by dragging the sliders.

Now, because your resultant wave can sometimes suffer from center-channel dropouts of things like bass guitar and bass drum, here's something else that you can do 'after' you've run the vocal cut (ala, center-channel cut) preset on a file...

(this tip is easiest to achieve in multitrack, but could also be done with Mix Paste)

After using the Vocal Cut preset on your file, save it (with a new name) and hit Ctrl-M to insert the file into Multitrack.

Open the original file (pre-vocal cut) and run a low-pass filter on it so that ONLY frequencies below 200Hz pass thru (effectively cutting everything above 200Hz). This will leave you with a stereo waveform that has possibly 'some' vocal element, but will primarily carry the bass and bass frequencies.

Now, insert the 'low-pass' file into MT, aligning it with the vocal-cut version. Play with the volumes to achieve a proper balance. This will allow you to restore a bit of the stereo image (if needed) as well as improve some of the low-end response (if it suffered to begin with)...

Food for thought.

when we put this together you get this plan:

All these 'vocal cut applications work the same way. You can do it manually, using a wave editor such as Cool Edit or Audition, or you can rely on some other bit of kit which does all the steps automatically - but the end result is the same.

1 - Take a stereo file

2 - Invert the phase of one channel

3 - Add the two channels together

That's it - that's all you do. Now for what happens.

1 - Anything that was centre stage (hopefully, in this case, the vocal) will be cancelled out.

2 - This includes the bass, kick drum and anything else that was also centre stage.

3 - Material which is close, but not, centre stage will also reduce in level.

4 - The end file will be mono.

4 - On most modern recordings, FX returns are stereo or pseudo-stereo. Thus all the FX returns on the vocal will still be heard.

The truth of the matter is that you can, perhaps, on some recordings, reduce the vocal level. Whether or not you can reduce it enough is only discovered by trying it out. You will still have to contend with the problems of other instruments which also vanish, the generally reduced bass level and the FX returns.

However, the general answer is you will not be able to do this to any effective degree unless you are extremely lucky in your choice of original recording.


voor meer uitgebreide tutorials verwijs ik je naar: www.members.lycos.nl/bramcom187/index.php?s=fc79e0e1b35ad833ad72872d70cb8579&showforum=9

dit is mijn topic over tutorials voor cool edit pro en adobe audition!

groeten,

Bram..

ik ben blij om te horen dat je al vorderingen maakt...mijn neefje heeft al vanaf zijn geboorte geen vingers aan zijn linkerhand (ja ik ben er aan gewend maar toen mn vriendin het zag moest ze wel slikken dus ik weet wel ongeveer hoe de reakties zijn van andere bij jou). Hij is nog jong maar gaat waarschijnlijk ook ooit wel dat doen wat jij hebt gedaan. Ik ben dus heel benieuwd wat het gaat worden! ik vindt het echt gek gewoon, dat de techniek zover is dat je gewoon met ''machine'' je vingers weer kan bewegen!

in ieder geval suc6 met je revalidatie!

Bram..

hoop niet echt dat er een 2004 mix komt....dan wordt het net zoals no dip...zelfde concept maar net iets anders....

www.new-line.nl/v/12281

een 2 band eq. ik heb er 3 nodig ;-) maar aardig dat je het voorstelt....voor 20 euro mee rheb je een veel betere mixer! ik zou daarvoor gaan (ook al is behringer niet hufterproof het is ook voor thuisgebruik).

paar foto's via google:

images.google.nl/images?q=cdj-20&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=nl

rond 2004 komt hij (zucht hoe toevallig in januari of december)? maar hij ziet er wel leuk uit (al geef ik tocoh de voorkeur voor zilver en een WIT display. Oranje vindt ik zo oudlullig ^_^ maar goed we zullen toch ff moeten wachten op de eerste reviews, want de specificaties zeggen niet alles ;-)

Bram...

dat is zeker mogelijk met de vmx-200